Today's pet peeve: "We will/won't achieve <AI milestone X> by <year Y>" without any reason whatsoever for the *specific number Y*. If you see this happening, you can help by just asking "How did you get that number?"
-
Show this thread
-
If I ask you this, and you say "well X seems far away, and Y is a big number", you'll honestly earn points in my book for at least stating that clearly.
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @catherineols
False precision isn't progress. Sometimes arguments are better without numbers.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @catherineols
I forget the exact source, but I like the observation "Better a vague answer to a good question than a precise answer to a bad question." But many people prefer to operate in world B, perhaps because it gives them a (false) sense of certainty.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @catherineols
Looks like this may have been from John Tukey: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Tukey
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Sounds like a Tukeyism, and that's a great quote! Pretty sure I remember something from von Neumann along these lines, too.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.