This is true - a set of ideas introduced by economists to study the distribution of wealth _also_ turn out to govern the behaviour of quantum entanglement. Pretty wild! Here's the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9811053.pdf …https://twitter.com/enclanglement/status/1117832062600450048 …
-
-
Thanks for the clarification, didn't realize Lorentz has been an economist, interestingly that paper went to the American statistical association
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A classical analogue is that if you have a set of iron balls in a vacuum with temperatures {T_1, ..., T_n}, and strategically allow them to momentarily touch to exchange heat, you can get them to temperatures {S_1, ..., S_n} if and only if the former set majorises the latter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.