Most scientific & mathematical disciplines I know of have results that educated outsiders can appreciate and go "wow" after a brief acquaintance, even without understanding the details. Does anyone know of such a result for category theory?
-
Show this thread
-
Note the word "brief" here. This request is easily fulfilled for fields ranging from linguistics to algebraic geometry to general relativity to molecular biology. Curious if there is such a result for category theory.
3 replies 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
Eg general relativity: gravitational lensing, the existence of black holes, the fact the planets are really going in "straight lines" (geodesics) around the sun, in the right geometry... each has a great 2-minute explanation. (And dozens of other phenomena, too.)
5 replies 0 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
The one thing I know of that sort of fits - the definition of the tensor product of modules in terms of a universal mapping principle is clearly inspired by category-theoretic ideas (and is very nice). But not a big "wow", & needs quite a bit of background to be "brief"
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
An example, from general relativity: "If you're on a spaceship, and carry a really good clock down near to the event horizon of a black hole, and come back, you'll find that time has slowed down relative to people who didn't go on the trip". Dwell on that, & it's mindblowing.
1 reply 3 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Or an example from complex analysis: suppose you have a function that's analytic everywhere in the complex plane. Than integrate it round a closed curve in the complex plane, and you'll find that you get 0. Again, it's mindblowing!
2 replies 0 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
For the last, you need to know what analytic means: (f(z+epsilon)-f(z))/epsilon approaches a constant limit as epsilon approaches 0, everywhere. Intuitively, the key thing going beyond real differentiability is that epsilon can approach 0 from any direction in the complex plane
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Really? I thought a function is analytic if it is infinitely differentiable and you are saying it is analytic if it is differentiable once. Maybe the latter implies the former. I never really took a complex analysis class.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The latter implies the former. It's quite remarkable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.