Most scientific & mathematical disciplines I know of have results that educated outsiders can appreciate and go "wow" after a brief acquaintance, even without understanding the details. Does anyone know of such a result for category theory?
-
-
The one thing I know of that sort of fits - the definition of the tensor product of modules in terms of a universal mapping principle is clearly inspired by category-theoretic ideas (and is very nice). But not a big "wow", & needs quite a bit of background to be "brief"
Show this thread -
An example, from general relativity: "If you're on a spaceship, and carry a really good clock down near to the event horizon of a black hole, and come back, you'll find that time has slowed down relative to people who didn't go on the trip". Dwell on that, & it's mindblowing.
Show this thread -
Or an example from complex analysis: suppose you have a function that's analytic everywhere in the complex plane. Than integrate it round a closed curve in the complex plane, and you'll find that you get 0. Again, it's mindblowing!
Show this thread -
For the last, you need to know what analytic means: (f(z+epsilon)-f(z))/epsilon approaches a constant limit as epsilon approaches 0, everywhere. Intuitively, the key thing going beyond real differentiability is that epsilon can approach 0 from any direction in the complex plane
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Relevant Chomsky quote: https://www.stephenhicks.org/2013/11/27/chomsky-on-postmodernism/ …
-
Yes, I think often of the start of that Chomsky note (it's attributed, AFAIK) when someone waxes poetic about category theory. But see my more positive remarks elsewhere in this thread.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, sorry, I don't think there is one. Category theory is some serious math major stuff, and even most math major-track people never see much of it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You know in topology tea cups and donuts are equivalent? You can morph from one the other smoothly without tearing or creasing, like shaping clay or a rubber sheet. The rules about creasing come from topological smoothness ideas...
-
More generally, instead of shapes or surfaces you can handle arbitrary mathematical objects and their morphisms. Whether objects can morph to each other is determined by the rules of those objects, like how the smoothness ideas lead to rules about creasing in topology.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Haskell functional programming language is a triumph of category theory.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.