Is it possible to have a climate-friendly variant of bitcoin where miners can only operate using negatively priced electricity (surplus from renewables)? They'd then mostly have the effect of making it more economic to increase the contribution of renewables to base load.
-
Show this thread
-
I don't immediately see how to ensure that only negatively priced electricity (or, at minimum, renewable) could be used. There might be some clever authentication process possible, though...
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
*"increase the contribution of renewables to the _grid_", not base load.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
An amusing enforcement mechanism would be to require that power-generating entities participating could only be paid for power in the underlying coin - let's call it greencoin.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Mining a block would require specifying who you bought your power from, and the price (negative!) paid - i.e., a pointer to the relevant transaction - in addition to the standard things done in mining.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Lots problems with this. Still, an amusing idea, and if it could be made to work would address two big problems simultaneously.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
(Context for all this: a huge problem with renewables is that they can be difficult to turn on and turn off. Both California and Germany, which have large renewable components to power, often have to pay other regions to take power off their hands, lest it overwhelm the grid.)
5 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Proof of work as battery, of sorts, storing value instead of electricity? If I'm understanding right I like the idea!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Nice way of putting it!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.