Also, to keep a theme going: This is just where my current thinking is going, not a slam-dunk. If you disagree with this, or even just think an important aspect is neglected, I would *love* to see a counterposition.
-
Michael Nielsen disputed some of the examples:https://twitter.com/michael_nielsen/status/1106406616813821952 …
I'm not sure that's disputed, so much as some of the examples are just flat-out wrong. But I would say that 
The Deep Blue paper is full of stuff about the human chess knowledge they used, directly contradicting Sutton's essay. His other examples are only somewhat better
-
-
Which is a pity - there's a really interesting essay to be written on this subject. A partial example is Banko and Brill's nice 2001 paper, with this amazing graphpic.twitter.com/746kKcs7OU
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just meant to say that you criticized some of the examples
-
Sure, got it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.