I wondered the same thing, but it looks as though they really do act in a philanthropic role (which Ikea basically doesn't).
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
it's the same for LEGO
-
The LEGO foundation only owns 25% and the founders family is still in control. However, many other major Danish companies are controlled by non-profit foundations, e.g. Novo Nordisk (insulin), Lundbeck (anti-depressives), Grundfos (pumps), and Carlsberg (beer).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Germany is one of the few European countries with much more permissive legislation for foundations and how much profit they can carry over..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ha, I didn't know! (I once wrote a screenplay that was nominated for an award by them and they invited us all over and seemed like v nice people.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Guardian uses a similar model. A not-for-profit parent company (The Scott Trust) runs a bunch of profit-seeking companies, whose primary purpose is to ensure the editorial independence of The Guardian newspaper (which on its own, tends to run a loss).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same for Krupp afaik. Difference to "Open"AI is that these were for-profit first, then became owned by a non-profit. Similar outcome but not as deceptive about motives.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i came across this last year and was also impressed. the for-profit Bosch has tended to be very successful, in part by ensuring regular dividends accrue to the shareholders. their blue chip policies starkly contrast with companies hell-bent on elevating their stock prices.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.