Encouraged by the University of California's widely-discussed decision to push back against Elsevier:https://www.chronicle.com/article/U-of-California-System/245798 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
A critical issue seems how to design a system that rewards entities that more efficiently and effectively disseminate or communicate knowledge, when the economic benefits tend to arise many years later. A structural problem in capitalism: short-termism, so have to rely on govs.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ceptional
Yeah, very much so. Though of course capitalism has found a lot of really interesting ways round that problem. Even interest rates are an example, not to mention venture capital, insurance, and lots of other tools all aimed squarely at that.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @ceptional
In general, I wonder a lot at the possibility of creating new types of market that help address some of this problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Such as quadratic voting as described in
@glenweyl 's Radical Markets for allocation of collective resources to many initiatives?1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Yes. Or dominant assurance contracts & elaborations. Or by taking the Ostrom principles much more seriously. Or ideas futures markets. Or ... [etc etc etc]
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.