Good for the University of California for canceling its subscriptions to Elsevier. Science doesn’t need for-profit journals.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @seanmcarroll
An interesting point made in John Willinsky's (very pro-open access) book "The Access Principle": the not-for-profit publishers have been much more conservative in many ways than the for-profits.
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @seanmcarroll
Let's separate for-profit where the publisher *owns* the journal and it's content from for-profit companies that earn a profit by providing services, which is the model I prefer to avoid capture and incentives for publisher to profit from restricting dissemination. Arxiv does a
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Important thing well; need to redirect subscription money to yes, build more advanced infrastructure like for literate dynamic documents.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
michael_nielsen Retweeted michael_nielsen
If an org like arxiv has a de facto monopoly, you can expect the same rate of innovation (glacial) as nearly all monopolies through history. Money's not the principal issue; having a competitive ecosystem is. Fuller argument:https://twitter.com/michael_nielsen/status/1101997243786117120 …
michael_nielsen added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.