Which of these do you want to learn more about: - What e^A means when A is a matrix - How to think about solutions to linear systems of ordinary differential equations.
-
-
Replying to @3blue1brown
I'm sure you've seen this (and maybe we've talked about it?), but just in case not, it's a very good paper with one of the best titles ever: "19 dubious ways to exponentiate a matrix" http://www.cs.cornell.edu/cv/researchpdf/19ways+.pdf …
4 replies 10 retweets 93 likes -
-
Replying to @3blue1brown
It's a really fun exercise in realizing how many ways there are to think about a mathematical object!
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @3blue1brown
A beautiful little result about exponentiation that should be much better known is this result of Thompson's; it says exponentiation of Hermitian matrices almost commutes.pic.twitter.com/LotR9av0cf
3 replies 11 retweets 51 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Rather than framing this as something which should be better known, might it be better to say the spectral theorem and its implications should be deeper in peoples bones?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @3blue1brown
Ofc I love the spectral theorem - it's coincidentally the result I've proven most often in public writing - but this result of Thompson's is very different (and seems to be much harder).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Hmm, okay, I'm clearly taking too quick a glace then. Just to check myself, am I right in thinking U and V are the change of basis matrices which diagonalize H and K? So e^(iUHU*) will be diagonal with e^{i lambda} entries on the diagonal?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @3blue1brown @michael_nielsen
Hmm, I guess not, actually. If that were the case, UHU* + VKV* would be diagonal, with eigenvalues lambda_i + mu_i, if lambda_i are the eigenvalues of H and mu_i are the eigenvalues of K. So the rhs above should be diagonal with e^{i(lambda_i + mu_i)} entries on the diagonal.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
That's right. When H and K don't share a common basis there's no obvious reason to expect there to be any relationship between the spectrum of exp(iH) exp(iK) and H and K. Thompson tells you there's a really strong relationship.
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Interesting. Is there a short answer to what U and V are in this case?
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @3blue1brown
Not as far as I know. In fact, I'm not even certain there's a constructive proof known - unless the situation has changed, Thompson's result depends on the proof of Horn's Conjecture by Allen Knutson, Terry Tao, and Alexander Klyachko, and I've never mastered that.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes - 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.