Which of these do you want to learn more about: - What e^A means when A is a matrix - How to think about solutions to linear systems of ordinary differential equations.
-
-
Replying to @3blue1brown
I'm sure you've seen this (and maybe we've talked about it?), but just in case not, it's a very good paper with one of the best titles ever: "19 dubious ways to exponentiate a matrix" http://www.cs.cornell.edu/cv/researchpdf/19ways+.pdf …
4 replies 10 retweets 93 likes -
-
Replying to @3blue1brown
It's a really fun exercise in realizing how many ways there are to think about a mathematical object!
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @3blue1brown
A beautiful little result about exponentiation that should be much better known is this result of Thompson's; it says exponentiation of Hermitian matrices almost commutes.pic.twitter.com/LotR9av0cf
3 replies 11 retweets 51 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Rather than framing this as something which should be better known, might it be better to say the spectral theorem and its implications should be deeper in peoples bones?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @3blue1brown @michael_nielsen
As in, this is the sort of fact you could know should be true before seeing it, if you're comfortable enough with what it means to exponentiate a matrix, and Hermitian matrices.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
To be honest, I still think it's shocking! I like the result because it's the kind of thing that might ultimately be used to prove things about quantum computational complexity (and maybe, classical computational complexity).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.