I tried to write out an explanation of how the heating due to greenhouse gases works, and realized there's a big hole in my understanding. Can someone who understand the detailed physics help or point me to a really clear and thorough explanation?
-
Show this thread
-
A very simple model (neglecting many effects, but should still work) is as follows: solar radiation comes in. Some is reflected off clouds, while some passes through the atmosphere. Some reflects immediately back from the Earth, and passes back through the atmosphere.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
But the Earth also absorbs some of the radiation, heating the Earth. At equilibrium that energy is later re-radiated. Crucially, that's at infrared frequencies, where greenhouse gases make the atmosphere somewhat opaque
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Intuitively, the GHGs makes the atmosphere a little like a one-way "blanket", allowing some energy through (at optical and UV frequencies), but making it harder for the infrared radiation to get back out again.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
The net effect is for the Earth to have to heat up a little extra, thus producing a little more infrared so that at equilibrium the total amount of energy escaping is the same as the total amount of energy incident.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
What I don't understand: the IR that's being blocked by the GHGs is energy which has already been absorbed by the Earth. So this shouldn't change the Earth's overall absorbivity, and I don't see how it could change the Earth's temperature.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Twitter may not be the best medium for this(??) But if someone who understands this well can point me to a good explanation, I'd appreciate it. Thanks!
6 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
@AndrewDohertyQu@dabacon@worrydream@patrickc Do you know?2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @AndrewDohertyQu and
Here's my attempt. ENERGY IN = ENERGY OUT. Model OUT as Stefan-Boltzman, so proportional to T^4. Except some of the "OUT" doesn't make it out due to atmospheric absorption of IR. So T has to increase to get the equation to work.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The issue I'm worried about: why does the emissivity in Stefan-Boltzmann change? After all, there's no increase in net absorption due to the GHGs (everything absorbed by the GHGs has _already_ been absorbed once before, by the Earth).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.