BTW, as @pierre_azoulay says, if you don't like the term "disruptive" here - it's an overloaded and much-abused term - just substitute "interesting novelty".
Show this thread
Evidence - as opposed to hearsay or intuition - that small research teams tend to do more "disruptive" work.https://twitter.com/pierre_azoulay/status/1095777166971809808 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've often suspected that the fact that startups initially consist only of the founders – which most founders think is a problem they must "fix" as soon as they have money to – is actually one of the reasons startups work at all.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Whoa, was just going to tweet a link to this article and this tweet of yours was on top of my timeline:https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/02/why-small-science-still-matters/582685/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mon dieu! It cannot be! Collaboration! Bump zones! Multidisciplinary!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There should be way more focus on creatively playing around, and not just in science. Basic income would help give people a sense of dignity and security... otherwise it's more safe and sensible to do boring stuff.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.