The more successful the founder, the less they tend to know about fundraising technique. E.g. Zuck has only had to raise money a few times, and every time investors were already eager to give him money.
There's a similar tendency (and, as you say, it's just a tendency) in academia, where s/academic politics/fundraising technique/.
-
-
Note: by "successful" here, I mean in the sense of "generating important lasting insight about the world", not "good at getting grants", which people sometimes confuse with the former. Actually, there's also a similar phenom among founders, now that I think of it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be really fun to write a Silicon Valley edition of Cornford's _Microcosmographia Academica_.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not really a parallel there. I can’t see how less influential academics get better at receiving funding because they have to try harder.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.