Wanted: a metareview for disciplines (e.g. in neuro or cog). Like @cochranecollab. Logically and data wise analyzes any sub-field and evaluates if it's logic works.
-
As nearly as I can tell, nearly all disciplines operate on a ratchet, not a binary "does its logic work": the methods start out terrible, and gradually improve, with standards slowly getting higher and higher as more is understood.
The reason, as nearly as I can tell, is that a stronger theoretical understanding helps enforce higher standards in new experiments. So as a discipline matures it can afford to impose higher standards.
-
-
Is there a way to make this happen faster?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.