20-somethings play a valuable ecological role in Twitter communities IMO: Discovering ideas/content for the first time, which older members will view as "classics", and enthusiastically sharing. Used to mess w/ my head ("others probably know this") but now I see it as a positive
-
Show this thread
-
I have a theory: The people that feign surprise ("You JUST learned about X?") are more often other 20-somethings looking to differentiate themselves as more in the know than others their age. Older members tend to either let newbies be or they appreciate a good resurfacing.
3 replies 10 retweets 102 likesShow this thread -
-
-
Heh. I feel very subtweeted.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Also, the funny thing about quality: most things are worth reading either 0 times (the great majority) or 100 times, IMO. Very few things are worth reading exactly once.
7 replies 16 retweets 117 likes -
This is why resurfacing of gems is so valuable, IMO.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @backus
also, the age-based social structure
@backus illuminates provides a nice "real" reason for the resurfacing, which feels much better than, say, a script that sends you a classic to re-read every Tuesday.2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
This is one thing I miss about academia: a much flatter age distribution. Nothing like discussing a 40 year old-essay with a friend of the author's (who read it 40 years ago), a student of the author (who read it 30 years ago), an experienced colleague (20 years), etc etc.
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
Having 5 people with deep but utterly different backgrounds in a room is something academia (sometimes) does very, very well.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.