I often find myself torn between “Wow large organizations are astoundingly incompetent” and “On the other hand, logistics underlies basically everything around me.”https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/1080637153539952647 …
As I'm sure you know, if you look at a heat engine, they're astoundingly inefficient; it seems like a waste, until you understand there are fundamental reasons why this is true. I wonder if the same is true of large organizations?
-
-
When I think about places/organizations such as airports and universities, I'm astounded at the number of people with highly specialized functions who need to work so precisely together to make it all work and not fall apart. And yet, yes, there is astounding inefficiency too.
-
Yep. I often think about this when technical people complain about meetings. I do think better meetings are often possible, but it's subtle what they're about: achieving co-ordination, common knowledge, uncovering what the group doesn't know it doesn't know, etc.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Stafford Beer thought so. With human systems where 20% of your workers are doing all the work, you can't just fire the inefficient 80%. When you come back in a year, you'll find the same 80/20 situation has reasserted itself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Makes me want to model some corporations as heat engines and see what the numbers say...paper?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ronald Coase's theory of the firm says a lot about that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_the_firm …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.