Trying to do a better job of making use of out what I read, and I vaguely recall a tweet about someone's fairly involved reading process, involving notes during reading, and even writing summaries after reading. I think maybe @patrickc retweeted it, but I can't find in search :|
-
-
-
@fortelabs is insightful on this topic!1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
-
Replying to @patrickc @devonzuegel and
Or maybe some stuff in https://fs.blog/2018/05/patrick-collison/ ….
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @patrickc @devonzuegel and
To toot my own horn, there's quite a bit about how to read (especially technical papers) in http://augmentingcognition.com/ltm.html . Also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=666615 I also recommend Adler's "How to Read a Book"
3 replies 4 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @patrickc and
@michael_nielsen would automatic Anki deck generation based on recent Kindle pages work? Or does the author *need* to compose the cards in order to remember?3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
I'll bet most automatic methods would generate terrible questions. If it could generate a good enough network of questions I think it'd work. Getting to an algorithm which could consistently do "good enough" is an interesting challenge.
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen @danielgross and
Oh - it really is a "network" of questions, too, I think, or collection - somehow the collective effect of cards matters. A card isn't "good" in isolation, but rather as part of an ensemble.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.