Is it just me or do Hollywood bad guys throw around comically low numbers? Like, the putative price for the research program behind Jurassic Park wouldn’t even fund the CGI dinos to say nothing about the real ones.
-
-
Since quite a few people are reading this, I should clarify: later in his career his budget kept rising & rising. I guess to hundreds of thousands of today's dollars. Still very inexpensive (a few seconds of Jurassic Park CG). And much of his best work was done early in career
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's uncanny - leaving aside infrastructure, where lab techs and such much much cheaper at the time?
-
It's possible the techs were part of overhead, i.e., supporting infrastructure provided by the university. (It was tough to find, and I made the mistake of not bookmarking it, so I won't try to dig it up right now. In a footnote found on G. Books, I believe.)
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Would probably pay for at least 1 or 2 frames of CG in the new Jurassic Park movies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did the budget also say where the money came from?
-
Don't remember.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where does one dig up old lab budgets?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Annoying how smaller particles cost more. They're heavier, but the price per ounce is higher.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Man I really need to write a thread on the history of experimental 20th century physics. Quantum mechanics all started with people just looking at a furnace, so cool
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.