That is: there is no strong growth model or notion of competitive displacement for scientific institutions. And this means stasis and homogeneity and monoculture, a lack of organizational change and learning. This is terrible for science.
-
-
Of course, these are just a few ideas. I believe humanity has barely begun to explore the space of possible approaches to doing science. What are the high-order bits in how we do science? What new approaches can we take to discovery?
Show this thread -
We’re both very, very optimistic that we can do vastly better than today. But it needs new ideas, lots of experiments, and lots of imagination!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You might be interested in what we are building at http://scite.ai . Utilizing a deep learning approach we've built an automated way to see how research has been cited, specifically if it has been supported or refuted.https://medium.com/@sciteai/super-powers-for-researchers-9e6c93ef459d …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AI - potentially lethal. caution would seem wise
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should come to this workshop on AI and collaborative open science at Stanford if you’re available! https://www.epatters.org/tacos19/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.