Disappointments: when 23, reading a paper, realizing: 'this is Peak Human'. I had grown up: now differences were quantitative, not qualitative. Never again would I see leaps like object permanence, counting, reading, the future, death, logic, sarcasm, programming, statistics...
-
Show this thread
-
I didn't understand the paper, but I realized that I 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 understand it - it was simply a matter of time & energy & prerequisites. It was not beyond me in a fundamental way. There were no more Piagetian levels. Isn't it sad, that it only takes 20 years or so, and that's it?
13 replies 4 retweets 94 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @gwern
I've often had similar thoughts & a similar sense of disappointment. I wonder if they're right, though, or if I'm not perceiving important stages in people's aging.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
When you're a child, you can see older people accomplishing things you can't even understand how they are doing it. You can see the valuable results but the process is a total blackbox. I don't see anything similar when I look at older people now.
5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @gwern
Ah, that's an interesting difference. I do. And I know that as a child many of the most important processes were things I didn't even see at the time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I guess I equivocate on this! I know people where I suspect what they're doing relies on really new levels I don't have (and may never have). But I'm not sure that's true, either!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.