There's a very useful idea for thinking about the history of research and discovery that I call "the velocity of discovery".
Show this thread
-
Furthermore, that can be a good thing! We need at least a few people who continue pursuing what are now unfashionable ideas.
Show this thread
I find this line of thought extremely helpful when I'm finding it tough to find a research problem I'm really excited about. I can't move as fast as the overall frontier of opportunity moves, and shouldn't try to. It's better to figure out where the wave really ought to be.
-
-
That is, work on discovering really important problems that rely on my strengths & interests, a long time before others do, & doing something about it. I'll be unfashionable, even incomprehensible, much of the time. But also more likely to work on what matters than chsing fashion
Show this thread -
And, sometimes, it means just being patient, not trying to force it, and jumping on an unimportant problem out of some mistaken desire to be busy or to do what is fashionable.
Show this thread -
A missed tweet, just before "No offense": 10 years later you look like a genius who foresaw deep learning becoming huge. But maybe you were a product of good luck: lots of people take many combinations of classes, & a few will by chance take combinations that later look prescient
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.