The Nobel Prize is an interesting event. The recipients go from being venerated by a few hundred or thousand of their peers to being celebrities. For the rest of their life they're often introduced as a "Nobel Prizewinner", their opinion is sought by media & the famous, etc.
-
-
There's research saying that winning a Nobel adds two years to your lifespan, but doesn't mention that that's entirely taken up with boring speeches.https://www.theguardian.com/education/2007/jan/17/highereducation.uk1 …
-
Reply of the day. Possibly the year.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Feynman on Nobel is good. Catch-22. Don’t want it but cannot be the guy that refuses it, that would be even worse!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
according to the following "Malevolent Hiding Hand applied in 78% of cases, whereas Hirschman's Benevolent Hiding Hand applied in only 22% of cases". I side though with Hirschman's belief that the Benevolent Hiding Hand "typically" applies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiding_hand_principle …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True for all winners-take-all systems: Politics (former presidents paid to do speeches), sports (olympics compound the issue with reducing opportunities), CxO, etc… In some species the second strongest males get killed and taken out of the gene pool during mating fights.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.