Open access is often argued about in the abstract. I want to talk about a specific case study where I have detailed data - usage patterns for my (open access) online book/monograph "Neural Networks and Deep Learning" http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap1.html
-
Show this thread
-
In so doing I'm going to violate conventional modesty norms. I've internalized those norms, so feel awkward about it (thus this tweet). I also think those norms often really should be ignored.
2 replies 2 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
I released the book chapter-by-chapter from November 2013 until completion in July 2015. It's received 14 million page views from 3.5 million users.pic.twitter.com/wsljEU7f28
3 replies 4 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
Here's the month-by-month pageviews:pic.twitter.com/kMZw9bZKVe
2 replies 1 retweet 25 likesShow this thread -
Of course, many (most!) users glance briefly at the book and then flip away, never to return.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
A more informative number: total time spent by readers is about 250,000 hours, or roughly 125 full time working years.
1 reply 1 retweet 38 likesShow this thread -
The book has been viewed in 231 countries. Here's the top 10:pic.twitter.com/xsGW9Oy8ab
3 replies 4 retweets 46 likesShow this thread
(There's a curious inconsistency between the percentages here and in the overall user data earlier. I have no idea why.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.