Dostoyevsky:pic.twitter.com/7sU5Ekwnf9
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Perhaps the rub is that it's not possible to be a good utilitarian without living up to DH's (etc) criterion. At which point you are no longer fully utilitarian.
There is a related point, which is that I will rarely trust data-driven studies by people who aren't intimately familiar with anecdote in an area. The latter seems to be an (often forgotten but) essential precondition for doing good data-driven work.
Following @DavidDeutschOxf, moral theories like utilitarianism don't provide objectives to maximize, but tools to assess solutions to moral problems. Plus, moral knowledge is as rich as scientific knowledge. There's no more one final theory of morality than of physics.
Utilitarianians maximize utility. If that’s the goal, then the child is sacrificed. The abhorrence of this is a refutation for most of us.
One could argue that moral reasoning starts with intuition and then progresses to justification. Without the gut reaction to certain things (like the suffering of an innocent), much of what we do cannot be understood.
I'm curious about how you can defend pure utilitarianism (utility maximization irrespective of means to achieve such) in light of these types of thought experiments. Maybe "pure utilitarianism" is simply a straw man, and all reasonable utilitarians have some "rules"?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.