People often claim that if someone _really_ believes something, they should be willing to bet on it at commensurate odds. I agree with this when money is clearly a primary motivator for that person. But if it's not, lack of willingness to bet means little about their sincerity
-
Show this thread
-
Quite a few replies are having trouble empathizing with the notion of not being motivated by money. Imagine the bet stakes are for a grimblful (win), and a thoktak (lose). These are fictitious, meaningless stakes; not being willing to bet would mean nothing about your sincerity.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm not interested in whether someone _should_ be motivated by money (which is what you're engaging with). I'm saying: if someone isn't, then this is the situation.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Lots of people aren't utilitarian, or are only utilitarian sometimes, or to a limited degree.
9:39 PM - 25 Jul 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.