The internet created a lot of new mediums. Blogs, vlogs, tl;dr culture, explainer videos, Twitter, podcasts, clickbait, ELI5, etc. It seems like we never saw new mediums emerge for academia. Probably because the same institutions are consuming and generating the content?
-
-
An amusing fact is that organizations which go beyond that can do very well for themselves. I can think of a few hires where (a) they did badly by standard metrics; but (b) someone crucial in the org truly engaged with the actual work, ignoring the metrics.
-
Yeah this reminds me of a hiring/recruiting tip. Basically, it is good to ignore certain signals like top tier university and impressive job history not because they aren't good signals, but because everyone is aware of them. Better if you can identify diamonds in the rough
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you see independent research as the route out of this? Eventually, enough independent reserachers circumvent the traditional route, develop their own brand, and academia begins to see this as a viable path?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just considering journal ranking means then they don't have to look into what the candidate actually researched..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.