Me on @MargRev (thanks @tylercowen):https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2018/05/michael-nielsen-standing-one-foot.html …
-
-
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @devonzuegel @michael_nielsen and
I'm worried that even asking this question is violating "Yes, and" culture, but: What *is* "Yes, and" culture? Is it about sharing cool things, rather than expressing opinions? (Or does it mean expressing opinions, but not expressing disagreement w/others' opinions?)
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @juliagalef @devonzuegel and
It’s a term from improv theatre, used to enable very good improvisational performances: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes,_and … Roughly, it means accepting what the other has said, and riffing in a direction inspired by it, not blocking.
3 replies 2 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @juliagalef and
It’s possible to violate, but usually requires considerable skill and a lot of established context. For similar reasons, online argument & judgement often fails.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @juliagalef and
You may be amused: I explicitly think in terms of a “Julia exception” (I swear I’m not making this up): you so consistently argue in good faith that it’s possible to argue productively with you even within the rather restrictive confines of Twitter.
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
-
Replying to @juliagalef @michael_nielsen and
You & Devon both do this (gracious, good faith disagreement) thing superbly -- which is part of why I was curious about how that relates to your notion of "Yes, and" culture.
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @juliagalef @devonzuegel and
Thankyou
As a default online mode with strangers or acquaintances I think it often works better than argument. For my particular intellectual style it’s also often a good strategy with friends (as is argument), serving a different purpose than argument.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @devonzuegel and
BTW
@michael_nielsen your timing is great - right before this exchange I had just emailed myself an example that fits your model better than mine (re: our recent disagreement over types of scientific thinkers)pic.twitter.com/WJlNjngZW1
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
You may yet convert the entire Internet to good faith argument, Julia
(Exaggerated, but sorta serious, at least for a non-trivial chunk of the Internet.)
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen @juliagalef and
Archeologists, yr 2952: we found civil discourse in parts of Twitter ca 2020. This "Galef Chunk" contradicts our current understanding of the Polarized Era.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
