@ChrisHanel I'm unclear on how trying to enforce 1 vote for 1 person, and verify eligibility, is bad. Maybe the implementation is bad?
-
-
Replying to @micahwhipple
The implementation is designed to blatantly target minorities under the guise of 'fairness'. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/08/03/courts-are-finally-pointing-out-the-racism-behind-voter-id-laws/?utm_term=.d65eb2021246 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChrisHanel
Ah, yeah so it looks like an implementation problem/discrimination. Disregarding some types of IDs that are perfectly viable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @micahwhipple @ChrisHanel
I see a lot of things that seem to imply any type of voter ID is bad, and I don't understand how that could be right.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @micahwhipple
1/ Any process for distributing voter ID's can easily disenfranchise those without easy travel/internet access = the poor.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChrisHanel @micahwhipple
2/ Even if there was, voting fraud is a non-existent problem. In the last BILLION votes cast in the US: 31 fraudulent votes.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ChrisHanel
I don't think there's a ton going on either, but to be fair the ones that can be proven are things like double votes or felons.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If there was actual large scale fraud it wouldn't be people doing dumb stuff like that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.