Want to hear a weird Blizzard story? We weren't allowed to refer to players as "fans." An exec had at some point realized fan is short for fanatic, and it had a slightly negative connotation. So that was it. Like a weird Disney-cast-members-can't-point kind of rule. We lived it.
-
Show this thread
-
For over a decade we had to contort our language and dodge around "fan" and use players, or champions!, or viewers, audience members!, supporters, etc. etc. No one knew for sure who came up with it, but it was a steadfast rule. Until one day...
1 reply 0 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
We found out who had imposed this rule (!) that had impacted so much of our writing and speaking for years, and asked them about it. Confused at first, they remembered and were sort of surprised anyone bothered keeping up with it. Then they sort of laughed and walked away.
3 replies 0 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
Use of "fans" slowly crept back into the Blizzard lexicon after that. You can make up your own moral for that one.
18 replies 0 retweets 51 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @micahwhipple
That’s classic. Kind of highlights the importance of continual calibration with other teams and people internally to make sure that everyone’s on the same page. Also, if it’s important it should be documented! Feels like something that was passed person to person as gospel.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This was a rule followed by, as far as I’m aware, all of Blizzard PR, marketing, CS, etc. Globally. Definitely tribal knowledge in some ways, but also very broadly enforced.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.