When companies talk about “synergies” for a merger or acquisition, it only means one thing… Job losses.
We need a merger ban to prevent more job losses. Period.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-16/goldman-warns-of-more-job-losses-with-jumbo-mergers-on-the-rise?sref=ZvMMMOkz …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here in Sweden we have a competition aurhority that prevents this. For example: Prohibition against anti-competitive coope Prohibition against abuse of a dominant position The Competition Act also contains rules for: Anti-competitive sales activities by public entities
-
here in America our government is bought and sold to large corporations!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Cooperation* not coope
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let’s add a billionaire ban so that wealth can not be hoarded.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need UBI because jobs are being automated at a pace never before seen. Then people can be creative about new job creation and not rely on large corporations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They’ll argue the weaker corporations will fail on their own and jobs will be lost regardless
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We also need the reinstatement of Glass-Stegall
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Long-term near-zero interest rates are having all kinds of unintended consequences. A rush to oligarchy is one of them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.