Someone just used the weirdest argument on me. Roughly: "You can't criticize Y's argument against X, because Y might have a better alternative X', so you have to find all the alternatives to X and prove that they're all worse." (Y does not have an alternative.)
-
-
*made up The "debate rules" always end up being essentially social in nature, and a-epistemological. It's an epistemological abdication of responsibility.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.