Clarifications and results within the fields of say engineering, medicine or behavioural psychology are easily shown and explained because the result can be shown objectively via testing/empirical evidence -https://twitter.com/AliceTeller/status/996211338308399104 …
-
Show this thread
-
- this doesn't hold for philosophy. It would rather disconcerting if people accepted a philosophical conclusion - 'Existence precedes essence' for instance - without first attending to the whole argument -
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
- an argument which is often reliant on a various predecessors and as such seems complex as it's intrinsically rooted to a vast amount of canon. If for instance a philosopher was to make an argument for a case without an intellectual legwork -
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
- one wouldn't take their case at face value or: '7. That whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must remain silent' is free-floating conjecture without the preceding Tractatus. This said -
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
- if you wish to internally repeat the phrase "Well why didn't you just say that?!" then read the French. Or, I also understand the frustrations.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.