- this doesn't hold for philosophy. It would rather disconcerting if people accepted a philosophical conclusion - 'Existence precedes essence' for instance - without first attending to the whole argument -
-
-
Show this thread
-
- an argument which is often reliant on a various predecessors and as such seems complex as it's intrinsically rooted to a vast amount of canon. If for instance a philosopher was to make an argument for a case without an intellectual legwork -
Show this thread -
- one wouldn't take their case at face value or: '7. That whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must remain silent' is free-floating conjecture without the preceding Tractatus. This said -
Show this thread -
- if you wish to internally repeat the phrase "Well why didn't you just say that?!" then read the French. Or, I also understand the frustrations.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.