Of course there should be an Islamic State. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/12/opinion/sunday/post-isis-muslim-homeland.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fsunday&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&assetType=opinion … This planet is large enough for FAR more regime diversity.
-
-
It's good to keep people on their toes.
-
Arguably the foundation for the primary division is London has been laid. Keeping people on their toes or; submission is more a matter of fatigue than anything else.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe, any good advice for Britain now is 'I wouldn't start from here'
-
Expand please...
-
The problems with grooming gangs, jihadism, creeping sharia are already commonplace, the case for fragmentation would be that those problems could be segregated, in the case of tower hamlets where vote fraud assures an islamist candidate it might just be acknowledging reality
-
The acknowledge of reality would have to be pure cognitive dissonance to be in-keeping with the times. These things are happening (reality) and not happening (cus we wouldn't let that happen) and are good (their culture) and are bad (reality).
-
What do you see the future being in Britain with regard to Islam or what would you do?
-
At first - like you said - a division, but that wont last long, ultimately I think Houellebeq's Submission is a fairly good estimate as to the future in that respect. Especially the assimilation into media and education. (Look at Germany)
-
I wld have thought division makes the houllebecq scenario less likely than wld be the case from keeping the nations together plus continued migration
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.