Ok. I don't see your point. Tbh, I think the proof should stand with the output: the art. Let it speak for itself. Its glaringly LW.
-
-
Replying to @literal_kittler @Marav0ne and
Ok, we're getting somewhere. How would one survey the political leanings of contemporary art then?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literal_kittler @Marav0ne and
That's one take. But surely what matters is what everyone is seeing? Very, very few will ever know of the curator/benefactor.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literal_kittler @Marav0ne and
One thing we never do on an art course is go to exhibitions. Rarely have i seen the curator at the forefront.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @literal_kittler @Marav0ne and
Ofc i have. What exhibitions are these? What institutions?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @meta_nomad @literal_kittler and
Sorry i misunderstood there. Ofc there's a curator for every exhib. But Ive rarely seen them be anything but a mention, except if the -
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
curation itself is of particular merit/curiosity e.g. Dali in Barcelona, William Turrell, Rothko Chapel.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.