Doesn't the 'work' of Patchwork - the stable coexistence - have in itself a democratic ideology?
Democratic was the wrong word. Just think the ideology of the 'work' is where tensions will be.
-
-
Could you expand on this a little?
-
Well, each patch is its own separate ideology or 'whatever-it-wants-to-be'. However, this only work if no patch proceeds to dominate other patches. Sure, have your fascist patch, just don't expect to invade other patches - this is where the work part comes in.
-
So, each patch has to somewhat agree that it won't disturb the inherent initial nature of other patches. This agreement itself has to be ideological....
-
Ah yeah. The question of re-drawing the maps doesn't exactly solve the reality of the territory.
-
I once saw a proposal to give each patch a single nuke. and it could only be launched if 2 more neighbouring patches agree to its use. but its in the context of zero tolerance towards territorial expansion. lol
-
Fallout 76: Patchwork. 1 nuke isn't much in terms of potential territory though.
-
I think patches will be extremely small. nothing like vast territories we see today. My own particular proposal is a mix of bioregional patchwork tied directly to watersheds.
-
In that case a nuke would impose on other patches.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.