Why is it?
-
-
Replying to @interregnumiii
They're benefiting from a capitalist system. Not sure they're pronouncing that one should be an overt capitalist though? (Peterson's emphasis on career is irksome for sure.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @interregnumiii @meta_nomad
The way to begin to frame self-care in leftist terms is to acknowledge it is a collective endeavor as much as a personal one. No idea how to accomplish that at a time when we're all "bowling alone"... but the digital infraestructure for it already exists.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @spooky_noumena @interregnumiii
To a certain extent 'self-care' _could_ be collective. Up until one wishes another to follow a certain path. Carl Rogers - I think - found that one can't help someone who simply does not want to be helped. What is the collective to do then?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @interregnumiii @spooky_noumena
And do you believe a collective network of support could alter a personal impetus?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Agreed. So, as per your initial comment, how would you remove self care from the capitalist machine whilst retaining the reality of personal impetus?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.