I think accelerationists reject free will across the board. Land is clear about this. There is no singular “willing” subject at the end of the day; free will is a false but useful assumption that simplifies communication.
-
-
Replying to @biodysphoria
> I think accelerationists reject free will across the board. One could put forth that it doesn't matter either way, we're not going to solve the problem of free will. So let's attend to our own camp's guidance.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @meta_nomad @biodysphoria
‘There is no singular “willing” subject’ is the key here I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @xenogothic @biodysphoria
Multiple wills taking 'different' willed routes converging on acceleration. U would immanentize all routes into the process, as it is the process. And R would allow for each singular will to be its own 'helmsman' (see Serres).
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @meta_nomad @xenogothic
I want to insist on r/acc not believing in “singular wills” in the final case. But maybe r/acc finds “singular wills” to be more useful as a lying abstraction; more emphasis on ““”praxis””” than “just let capital do its work and don’t interfere”
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @biodysphoria @meta_nomad
I think that’s a point L/R share and the U judgement of naivety comes from this trend towards consolidation being an open goal for the “forces” they say they’re opposed to. U/Acc is not wholly without praxis, but it’s on terms other to these.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @xenogothic @meta_nomad
Can you elaborate on the last sentence?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @biodysphoria @meta_nomad
L/R don't acknowledge the ways theyre already immanent to the processes they say theyre rebelling against. Each feeds the other, continuing the same old processes. U/Acc rejects praxes of both cos all they do is consolidate state and subject. U/Acc seeks to fragment both.pic.twitter.com/ulyl9GpYPB
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xenogothic @biodysphoria
It rejects praxis of both yet isn't this outer-system force its own praxis? What is it that is causing the fragmenting exactly?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @meta_nomad @biodysphoria
The fragmenting is already inherent. L/R, long before /acc, have always sought to course correct. The fragmenting of acc itself into its various offshoots is the ultimate irony. L/R try to course correct. U/Acc is Acc as it always was, unadulterated.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Wait, does uacc have an end goal?
-
-
"Let the future take care of itself"would be its end goal.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.