Treading Carefully 0.1: Continuing from yesterday's thread on the definitions of the Acc strands, it was - roughly - agreed that the contention between the 2 currently deadlocked camps (U/Acc & R/Acc) is in actuality a question of free will -
Cthulhu swims left *should* cover it. But, generally, the left is opposed to and regularly deconstructs and destroys hierarchical structures (bucko), that which is without any conditions cannot form a hierarchy of merit, surely it just is...
-
-
this is assuming a hard distinction between is and ought.
-
What?
-
there's clearly a hierarchy between what is and what isn't. between what manages to keep being and what goes extinct.
-
A binary hierarchy of that which is being (survived, alive) and that which is dead. That hierarchy flattens quite quickly due to the fact the dead have no effect on it.
-
it's not like there isn't endless competition among the living
-
You've completely missread my point. Hierarchy isn't the same as competition. People can compete but still not adhere to a common objective better or worse.
-
competition necessarily produces dynamic hierarchy (to the extent that some succeed and others fail). of course, it destroys static hierarchy. but the existence of static hierarchy is atithetical to acceleration.
-
What about status hierarchy in the short term as a means for wealth utilisation?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.