Treading Carefully 0.1: Continuing from yesterday's thread on the definitions of the Acc strands, it was - roughly - agreed that the contention between the 2 currently deadlocked camps (U/Acc & R/Acc) is in actuality a question of free will -
That which you *will* to do is your life's calling, life steering you towards a self-understanding. So, it is indeed the 'steering' aspect wherein lies the split, does life (or capital) steer, or does 'you'? U & R respectively.
-
-
It is merely coincidental then that life's steering, or non-quotidian desire seems to steer people towards that which they materially wish for/want too. This is flippant though.
-
Not coincidence at all: “libidinal engineering” gives the illusion of a calling whilst covering up manipulation — “communicative capitalism” is Fisher and Jodi Dean’s example: capitalism hijacking human will to communicate for its own ends, engineering desire for iPhones etc.
-
This was taken to teh extreme yesterday wherein capital has controlled humans from day 1. In your cited sense u/Acc are giving into the manipulation and letting capital - without conditions - do its thing?
-
I mean, that’s the Land/Negarestani abstract horror vision of capital, perhaps — Reza wrote of oil as that which has been lying dormant in the earth’s crust, ready to enslave us. The theory-fictional way of conceiving capital’s atemporal grasp on civilisation.
-
In this way, capital is “blobjective” — Reza neologism — an outside that nonetheless absorbs all that in comes into contact with. Such is the engine of our manipulation by capital.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.