my quibble exactly with @adornofthagn (which is why I don't think it's generally agreed upon). but the central point is that it's all about capital escape.
-
-
Again, this is how a humanist responds.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
from the human life perspective, technology is a thing to augment our lives from the technology perspective, humans are a thing to augment technology
-
Where did I disagree with this? Humans are a thing to augment technology. Yes. They are however the thing, part, etc. That's easiest to analyse?
-
if anything they're a needlessly complicated and failure-prone part, and one we are for reasons of basic epistemology least equipped to comprehend
-
Failure-prone, yes, 100%. I'm gonna DM.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
[stows documents away] that's because there are none, we are positively not cooperating with nuclear-armed ostriches, because they do not at all exist
-
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emu_War The real enemy is Emus.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
oh ffs, it's not like humans ever had a choice in their hands. we are tools built by forces much beyond our despicable phenomenology.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
