I think I made the differences between the two (now) clear, U/Acc members believe that U will take us elsewhere... It confuses things.
-
-
I think this is precisely it.
-
So in short, from uacc human action is tied to capital a priori?
-
I would say that humans have consistently over-estimated their level of conscious control. Almost to the point where we can formulate a definition of the human from this characteristic. "Human is the animal that believes itself to have a will"
-
The main argument, I guess in relation to capital. And it's not much of an argument, is that 'thus far' we've had -at least- a semblance of agency greater than other animals, which is ripe for questioning out motive in the universe.
-
I do think that capital can be derailed. But such an action, far from being emancipatory, would be catastrophic at the level of extinction.
-
You think capital can be derailed, ok, agreed. What, in your opinion, are the ways in which it can be derailed?
-
if it can be derailed (I'm not nearly as convinced of this as Max seems to be), it sure as hell can't be derailed by some apes doing some apeshit
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.