Emerging term? What would you like me to cash out?
-
-
well, zacc is the proposition that the answer to what happened is "capital can't take care of itself".
-
We will have the answer to this in the next 20-50 years globally, and some places the answer is pretty clear...at least to me.
-
At least we got somewhere. The split is the age old question of humans having authority over their reality, free will. Henlo academy!
-
I think this is precisely it.
-
So in short, from uacc human action is tied to capital a priori?
-
I would say that humans have consistently over-estimated their level of conscious control. Almost to the point where we can formulate a definition of the human from this characteristic. "Human is the animal that believes itself to have a will"
-
The main argument, I guess in relation to capital. And it's not much of an argument, is that 'thus far' we've had -at least- a semblance of agency greater than other animals, which is ripe for questioning out motive in the universe.
-
I do think that capital can be derailed. But such an action, far from being emancipatory, would be catastrophic at the level of extinction.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
"What happened", "what is happening" and "how does this whole thing work". z/acc i feel is more of a shallow fatalist approach and u/acc more of a involuntary naturalist approach
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
>only farmers ever went to gulags U wot m8???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.