Treading Carefully: As far as I can see the core problem of the U/Acc - R/Acc debate is unfortunately due to free floating definitions. With this said, let's define:
-
-
z/acc seems, to me, to be more than just recognizing political appropriation of capital. It is the absolute negation of acceleration per se. If acc recognizes that capital is a blast, z/acc points out that after a blast, only dust remains.
-
it's the greerian position: negative feedback cosmically predominates. nothing ever escapes etc.
-
Yeah. And that any positive feedback eventually results in an equal negative feedback process
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm banking on the ayys giving us a hand tbh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.