New blog post! The Risk Minimizer seeks to reduce risk all the way. They’re willing to sacrifice a lot. The Risk Balancer won’t increase risk if it’s not worth it. But they don’t want to lose out on the good just bc they’re avoiding the bad.https://narrativemancy.com/2020/03/27/risk-minimizers-and-risk-balancers/ …
Yeah, it's similar to a tragedy of commons situation where risk is a pollutant. I'm trying to show that neither side is a monster, which is harder if one side gets labelled "polluter." Their strategies for compromises are possibly quite useful
-
-
Aside from more meaningful responses, ToC is a flawed narrative: Link 1:https://medium.com/@gmokery/i-read-two-recent-science-fiction-novels-and-was-surprised-to-find-the-same-objection-and-a-similar-9ae5dd84433e …
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"If you exclude someone from being part of the resolution, they're not going to be a part of the resolution" Thinking - If one group is excluding another, well, that group is adding a problem. Now you have two. One solution for both is better, but two solutions is fine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.