They couldn't have chosen a worse way to show this data. The chart is highly misleading. Where's @EdwardTufte when you need him. https://twitter.com/Theremina/status/792490500833980418 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ReinH
~Circles~ ~with~ ~different~ ~diameters~ ~have~ ~different~ ~circumferences~
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ReinH
100% agree with your assessment but it’s a clock! if they’d made it look like a clock the circumferences would be ok i think
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mendel
1. Humans are bad at estimating arcs. 2. Are the lengths scaled based on varying circumferences? Impossible to say at a glance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The lengths of the largest and smallest "bars" are very similar but the largest number is almost 2x the smallest number.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ReinH
like i saw this basically — i wonder if it’d have been clearer (or more misleading?) if the longer times were on the outsidepic.twitter.com/oHZHHodagl
5:01 PM - 29 Oct 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.