Why did you gesture at conspiricism instead of dealing with the substance of the article? Nowhere in that tweet did I make it mutually exclusive, I am giving priority to the problem that adds up to millions of dollars a year in theft from ppl, over a corp insured against theft.
-
-
Replying to @GirlfrendsHaver @adamjohnsonNYC and
I didn’t gesture at conspiricism. It’s about his reputation and the reputation of the chron. That’s where critical reading and reading comp are impt. And retail theft is costing millions of dollars in losses in SF and it’s not as simple as corps being insured against the theft
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @GirlfrendsHaver and
The dollar amt is actually the point. The fact that he was paid pennies and then admitted he is an ideologue only shows that he’s a blind partisan advocate (that’s the definition of ideologue) who doesn’t care about his reputation at all bc his POV is dogmatic
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @adamjohnsonNYC and
If you don't think the people/sources pushing the narrative that this is shuttering stores that Target & Walgreens announced they'd be closing months ago are also ideologues, you're mistaken. That's an awfully convenient excuse not to deal with the substance of the article, tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GirlfrendsHaver @adamjohnsonNYC and
What I didn’t realize and now do is that Johnson is going to have the same opinion regardless of the facts, the data or the evidence. His opinion is worth the pennies he was paid. And you’re right, he doesn’t care about his reputation. At all.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @adamjohnsonNYC and
You haven't given a single reason why his reputation is bad in the 1st place. The fact that you're spending all of this time focusing on his reputation instead of the substance of the article only underscores that you're an ideologue yourself- at least Johnson is honest about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GirlfrendsHaver @adamjohnsonNYC and
I actually did speak about the substance. I said his opinion on the retail thefts in SF and the coverage of them was WRONG. I also he wasn’t comparing apples to apples. What he is doing is distracting from one issue by comparing it to a completely different issue.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @GirlfrendsHaver and
I also pointed that while a couple videos have led to national coverage, it’s bc this is, in fact, huge problem in SF right now. Any DA in SF will tell you those videos are a dime a dozen.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @GirlfrendsHaver and
And when I say any DA, im including the ones that work for Chesa and Chesa has hired. Johnson would know this if he bothered to interview or talk to anyone in SF for his piece.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @adamjohnsonNYC and
He should call the DA for comment on an article where he compares the media corps emphasis on sensational videos over lawsuits that directly affect 1000s of workers? The article is about media coverage, just bc he didn't give the perspective you prefer doesn't make it invalid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We are just going to have to agree to disagree.
-
-
Replying to @melG679 @adamjohnsonNYC and
Fair enough. Have a nice night.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.