Are there any accounts of "emptiness", preferably purely phenomenological/methodological, that don't presume a contentious metaphysics?
-
-
These are all actually exactly the sort of contentious metaphysical positions I have issue with.
-
If all we experience is map, stuff served up by the brain (how do you know anything about that organ in your skull just from meditation, and not from metaphysical interpretations of science?), then reference to reality is not possible.
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Only qualities are real; even concepts might be built out of qualities. And all the pith above, is itself empty cf the rigorous “emptiness of emptiness” material. Ballpark helpful? Or want less twittery or more authoritative stuff?
-
Realizing for the first time that the “territory” you’re staring at is in fact “map” can be a pretty holy fuck moment. Or like when you realize the “landscape” is filled with those patches and then like if/when entire field of experience is sort of “hanging” in “nothingness”
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
er. Things:
•
spiritual consulting
•
shamanic support (online/IRL)
•
hardcore meditation on-ramp & community
•
shitposts