How? This is the irrationality of PC theory. Nature , reality the universe, whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you think something is unfair! The philosophy literally teaches its adherents how not to think.
-
-
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
By recognizing that our scientific understanding of the world is as close to objective as we can currently manage, but no matters in science are ever settled. “PC theory(?)” has 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 to do with postmodernism. And why should I care what nature “thinks” about fairness?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @simon_enefer and
Nature doesn’t “think” man can fly, but here we are with like 15 types of flying machine
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
Nature doesn't care what we think or feel, it just is. It doesn't think or make value judgements. Similar you can't make Brad Pitt my equal, by wishing it so or by legislating it. The differences will still exist. So Brad will just have to accept I am smarter and better looking.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
I like the turn of phrase at the end, but so what? Nature also doesn’t think anyone is “smarter” or “better-looking” than anyone else, those are human concepts. Are you suggesting that someone is failing to recognize that everyone is unique, and that people have individuality?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
I hope not! But if you are 6ft 10inches and I am 5ft, should we have an equal right to join the NBA?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
Nope, nobody has a “right” to join the NBA. It should be a purely performance-based position.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
So what about university? If you score 800 in your SATs and I score 600, should I get to go because I am from a minority group and you are white?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simon_enefer @KEEMSTAR and
I’m pretty sure those sorts of policies are only applied between two candidates with the same score, so like if we both got 600s you’d go by default I think Affirmative Action is an ok idea, but an impractical band-aid that relies too much on a single criterion in practice
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mediocre_danny @KEEMSTAR and
Not true I am afraid. In fact a case brought by Asians against an Ivy League college is before the supreme court. The differences between stats are stark upto 200 higher for asians, 100 for whites vs African Americans. I thought it was "bad" to discriminate based on race.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well, yeah, if it was actually used to *disqualify* candidates with *better* applications, then that’s obviously bad. If it’s just an effect from just tipping the balance between equal applications, it’s like... neutral? Like I said, inefficient concept anyway.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.